Romanian Pass claims over 8,000 happy clients and 14-plus years in the business. But their domain was registered in January 2016. No legal entity under this name shows up in Russia's business registry. And every client signs a contract for "information consulting" only. So if your application gets rejected, they owe you exactly nothing. Sounds fine on paper. Let's look closer.
Services: Romanian citizenship via repatriation (Romania's Law 21/1991). Full document package prep, translation, notarization, apostille, ANC submission, case monitoring, oath coordination, Romanian ID documents.
Founded: The website has stated "since 2008" and "since 2011" on different pages. RDAP records show the domain was first registered on January 23, 2016. That's an 8-year gap with no explanation.
Claimed clients: 8,000 (unverified; no independent reviews match this volume).
Location: Moscow, 5th Monetchikovskiy lane, 3/1, office 302
Phone: +7 (495) 997-88-41
Email: [email protected]
Telegram: @RomanianPassBot
Website: romanianpass.com
Previously: Operated under the brand "Ladomir" (visa support) before 2015. Same phone number, different focus.
Key fact: Romanian Pass is not a law firm. It describes itself in its own legal disclaimer as a "private information consulting platform" with no attorney status. That means the contract you sign gives you zero legal recourse if your citizenship application fails.
Based on 1.54/5 from verified data points across anti-scam databases, forum complaints, and domain records.
The domain romanianpass.com was registered on January 23, 2016 through registrar REG.RU LLC. It expires January 23, 2027. Name servers: DNS1.YANDEX.NET and DNS2.YANDEX.NET. The domain owner is hidden behind privacy protection. The first snapshot of the live site on Web Archive dates to March 8, 2016.
The company says it has been working since 2008. That's 8 years before the domain existed. No archived version of romanianpass.com predates 2016. The earlier brand "Ladomir" used the same phone number but focused on visa support, not citizenship. So the claimed citizenship expertise "since 2008" rests on nothing publicly verifiable.
A search of Russia's EGRUL business registry finds no company registered under "Romanian Pass" or "Romanyan Pass" or any close transliteration. No INN, no OGRN, no registered address matching this brand.
International registries were also checked. OpenCorporates shows no match in the UK, Czech Republic, or Swiss registries. There is no Romanian-registered entity either.
The company's own website footer states it is "a private information consulting platform" and "not an attorney's office." No license for legal practice appears anywhere. The person running client consultations is identified only as "Vitaliy" (no surname). One Oleg Plashkovets promotes the company on VKontakte, claiming 12-plus years of experience, but his credentials are not independently verifiable.
Moshennik.eu issued a negative verdict: the company is accused of buying documents through personal connections, not having a permanent office, and lacking qualified legal staff. BBB shows no US-based profile. Trustpilot has no independent reviews for this domain. The aggregate site all-migration.com shows a 4.3 rating from just 3 reviews, which raises its own questions.
Bottom line: There is no registered legal entity to hold accountable. The contract is for consulting only. If something goes wrong, your legal options are extremely limited. This is the single biggest risk factor with Romanian Pass.
| Area | Risk | What we found | What to expect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | high | No price list on the website. Partial rates found: ANC inquiry letter from €499, case follow-up from €2,997, Romanian birth certificate from €997. The full package total is never stated up front. | You won't know the real cost until after an individual consultation. Clients report additional charges appearing during the process that weren't discussed at the start. |
| Contract | high | Clients sign an "information consulting services" agreement, not a legal services contract. The company's own website disclaims any legal status or responsibility for outcomes. | If ANC rejects your application, you have no contractual basis to demand a refund. Some forum users report that contracts were never even provided in writing despite repeated requests. |
| Timelines | high | Romanian Pass claims 18 to 24 months for the full process. ANC's current workload typically pushes cases to 2 to 4 years. The company cannot control ANC scheduling. | Plan for significantly longer than advertised. Forum complaints show cases running well past the promised window with no communication from the company during delays. |
| Document risk | high | Multiple anti-scam sources report that Romanian Pass has provided archive certificates for clients without actually restoring the underlying civil registry records (ZAGS). ANC cross-checks these records. | If ANC discovers the underlying records don't exist, the applicant faces rejection plus a potential permanent EU entry ban. The client bears all legal consequences, not the consultant. |
| Refunds | high | No refund policy is published anywhere on the website or in publicly shared contract templates. Forum users who demanded refunds after failed cases report getting no response. | Without a registered legal entity and a clear refund clause, recovering money through courts in Russia is very hard. Enforcement is essentially impossible for international clients. |
| Finding and what it means | |
|---|---|
| ✅ | Domain active since January 2016. Verified via RDAP. Eight-plus years online is meaningful. This isn't a site that appeared last month to collect deposits and disappear. |
| ✅ | Corporate email on own domain. [email protected]. Not a Gmail, not a free service. Consistent with at least some level of professionalism in communications. |
| ✅ | Specific physical office listed. 5th Monetchikovskiy lane, 3/1, office 302, Moscow. A room number is harder to fake than a vague city reference. Office visits are at least possible, though some reviewers report finding no one there on arrival. |
| ✅ | Active Telegram channel with roughly 3,400 subscribers. Ongoing content on Romanian citizenship law and ANC processes. Shows the operation is not entirely dormant. |
| ✅ | Substantive YouTube content dating back to 2017. Videos covering the citizenship process in real depth. Suggests at least some genuine expertise in the subject matter. |
| ⚠ | No published pricing. A company serving 8,000 clients that won't post even a starting price range is unusual. In established markets, that kind of opacity often signals flexible pricing that adjusts to perceived client wealth. |
| ⚠ | Lead consultant "Vitaliy" hides his surname. This is a single-contact operation where the key person refuses to be publicly identified. That makes accountability very difficult if things go wrong. |
| ⚠ | Marketing says "high success rate." Legal disclaimer says "no guarantees." These two things can't both be the full truth. The disclaimer is the legally binding version. Treat the marketing accordingly. |
| ⚠ | Pre-2015 brand "Ladomir" did visa support, not citizenship. The phone number links back. But visa processing and citizenship repatriation are entirely different legal processes. Experience in one doesn't translate to the other. |
| ❌ | No legal entity found in EGRUL or any international registry. You cannot sue a brand name. Without an INN or OGRN, there is no institutional anchor for any contract you sign. |
| ❌ | Contracts are for "information consulting" only. This is a deliberate legal structure designed to eliminate all liability. The company's own disclaimer confirms it. Your citizenship outcome is not their legal problem. |
| ❌ | Claims founding in 2008 or 2011. Domain registered in 2016. An 8-year discrepancy with zero public explanation. Companies with genuine long histories can document them. This one can't. |
| ❌ | Moshennik.eu issued a negative verdict. Specific accusations: buying documents through personal connections, no real staff of licensed lawyers, misleading clients about their actual eligibility for repatriation. |
| ❌ | Allegations of fake archive documents. Multiple independent sources report that archive certificates were provided without restoring the underlying records. This can result in a permanent EU entry ban for the applicant. Not for the consultant. |
| ❌ | No refund conditions published anywhere. Forum users who lost money after failed applications report being ignored. With no registered entity, legal recovery is effectively impossible. |
| ❌ | Forum thread about the company was hidden by moderators in 2021. A discussion on forum-eu.com covering complaints was removed by the admin. That kind of disappearance usually isn't coincidence. |
The company claims 8,000 clients helped over its operating years. If that number were even close to accurate, there would be hundreds of verifiable reviews across independent platforms. There aren't.
On Trustpilot, Google Reviews, Otzovik, and Glassdoor, independent positive reviews for Romanian Pass are essentially absent. The all-migration.com aggregate shows a 4.3 rating based on exactly 3 reviews. The company's own website publishes "success stories" that read as marketing material.
What does show up independently is less flattering. On forum-eu.com (before the thread was taken down in 2021), clients described specific problems: phone numbers that stop working suddenly, cases where clients arrived for document submission appointments but weren't on the list, additional fees for translations and notarizations that weren't in the original quote, and archives returned without the underlying records being restored. One client wrote that she paid for "basically nothing" when the process stalled and communication stopped.
On vashe-mnenie.com, the company is listed as a fraudulent resource with accusations of taking money without delivering services. Topimmigrant.com placed it in a "blacklist" category, citing a virtual office setup and no qualified legal staff. These aren't anonymous forum posts. They're catalogued complaints with details.
The 77% "word of mouth" statistic cited on one aggregator is interesting. It might mean satisfied clients refer friends. But it might also reflect a company that has no sustainable way to get public reviews because the real ones are negative.
Romanian citizenship through repatriation requires proving your ancestry goes back to Romanian territory as it existed between 1918 and 1940. That means original civil registry records, birth certificates, and marriage certificates from archives that may be in Moldova, Ukraine, or Romania itself.
Some intermediaries in this market take a shortcut. They provide clients with archive reference letters that say "records found" without actually completing the legal process of restoring those records in the Romanian civil registry system (ZAGS). To a client, the paper looks fine. To ANC reviewers, who cross-check with the actual registries, the discrepancy is visible.
This is the allegation against Romanian Pass documented on all-migration.com and referenced in moshennik.eu's verdict. If true, clients who used these documents in their ANC applications may have unknowingly submitted fabricated evidence to a foreign government. Romania's Law 21/1991 treats this as fraud. The legal consequences fall on the applicant, not the consultant who provided the documents.
And the consequences are severe. A finding of document fraud in an EU member state's citizenship process can result in a permanent ban from all Schengen countries. Not a temporary refusal. A lifetime restriction. That's before any criminal charges.
This isn't a theoretical risk. It's specifically what Romanian Pass has been accused of by multiple independent sources. Before using any archive documents provided by an intermediary, have them independently verified by a Romanian notary or attorney who can confirm the records exist in the actual registry.
The highlighted column is the company under review. Column 2. Legend: best = best value in this row, worst = worst value, mixed = depends on circumstances.
| Parameter | Romanian Pass ★ | Licensed Law Firm (Romania) | DIY via ANC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Hidden opaque | ~€1,500-3,000 visible | ~€100-300 cheapest |
| Legal entity | Not found in any registry unregistered | Registered, licensed, auditable verified | N/A |
| Contract type | Consulting only, zero liability weak | Legal services agreement, accountable strong | None needed |
| Refund terms | Not published anywhere none | Defined in signed contract clear | No fees to refund |
| Realistic timeline | Claims 18-24 months; clients report longer mixed | 2-4 years (honest estimate) | 2-4 years (same ANC queue) |
| Document verification | Allegations of unverified archive docs risky | Attorney-reviewed, legally accountable safer | Your responsibility entirely |
| Physical office | Moscow only; some clients couldn't access it limited | Romania or EU (closer to ANC) | None needed |
Note: Law firm prices are estimates for comparable services. DIY means applying directly to Romania's ANC, which is possible but requires strong document preparation skills and Romanian language ability (or a local notary).
If you're still considering working with them, do all of this before sending a single payment. Not after.
The honest answer is: it operates in a gray zone. The website is real, the Telegram channel is active, and the office address exists. But no legal entity under this name appears in any business registry, the contracts offer no legal protection, and anti-scam databases including moshennik.eu have issued negative verdicts. Whether that makes it a "scam" depends on your definition. What's clear is that the structure is specifically designed to avoid accountability. That's a problem regardless of what you call it.
Romanian Pass claims 18 to 24 months. Romania's ANC, which handles all repatriation cases, is heavily backlogged. Realistic timelines for the full process run 2 to 4 years depending on case complexity and ANC's current queue. Forum complaints about Romanian Pass specifically cite cases that stretched well beyond the promised window with little to no communication from the company during delays.
No. Their own website disclaimer states the company is a "private information consulting platform" and does not guarantee outcomes. All final decisions rest with Romania's ANC. Any verbal guarantee from a sales call has no legal value and no binding force under the contract you'll actually sign.
Yes. Multiple anti-scam sources report that Romanian Pass has provided archive reference letters without completing the actual record restoration in Romanian civil registries. If ANC discovers the underlying records don't exist, Romanian authorities treat the application as document fraud. The legal consequences fall on the applicant. These can include permanent Schengen entry ban and criminal charges. The consultant faces no legal liability because the contract covers only "information services."
No full price list is published. Partial figures found through research: ANC inquiry response letter from €499, follow-up case support from €2,997, Romanian birth certificate assistance from €997. The government passport fee is approximately 258 RON (roughly €59). The complete package cost is quoted only after an individual phone consultation. Clients report additional charges appearing during the process that weren't discussed initially.
The company claims so, with some pages citing 2011 instead. RDAP registration records show the domain romanianpass.com was created on January 23, 2016. The Web Archive's earliest snapshot is from March 8, 2016. There is no publicly accessible record of Romanian Pass existing under this name before 2016. The earlier "Ladomir" brand used the same phone number but focused on visa support, not citizenship repatriation. That's an entirely different service.
Independent reviews about Romanian Pass can be submitted and read at proverj.com, which aggregates user feedback on immigration companies. Migration.us.com publishes investigative reviews based on public data, domain records, registry checks, and client reports. If you've worked with Romanian Pass and want your experience documented, both platforms accept submissions.
I've watched the Romanian citizenship consulting market develop since the early 2010s, and I want to be direct about what I see here: the structure of Romanian Pass is specifically built to avoid accountability, not to serve clients.
The "information consulting" contract isn't a minor technical detail. It's the whole architecture of the business. When you sign it, you're agreeing that this company owes you information, not results. If ANC rejects your application after you've paid thousands of euros, Romanian Pass owes you nothing. That's not a gray area. That's in their contract.
What concerns me most is the archive document issue. I've seen similar cases in other markets. An intermediary provides what looks like a valid archive reference, the client submits it to a foreign government in good faith, and then the underlying record turns out not to exist in the actual registry. The client faces fraud findings. The intermediary says it was "consulting" and walks away. The consequences for the client can be permanent. A lifetime EU travel ban is not something you recover from.
On the positive side, the domain has been around since 2016 and the Telegram channel shows ongoing engagement with the subject matter. These aren't nothing. But they don't outweigh a missing legal entity, an 8-year founding date discrepancy, multiple anti-scam database flags, and contracts designed to shield the company from any outcome you might face.
If you have genuine Romanian ancestry and want to pursue repatriation, this is a real legal pathway worth exploring. But explore it through a licensed Romanian attorney who is registered with the Romanian Bar Association, works under a proper legal services contract, and whose name you can verify in a public registry. That person will be slower and possibly more expensive. They'll also still exist, and still be legally accountable, if something goes wrong 18 months in.
Romanian Pass, as currently structured, is a high-risk engagement. The rating of 1.54 out of 5 in the data we collected reflects that. My assessment agrees with it.
Marketing promises don't always match reality. Read what real clients say about Romanian Pass before you hand over a deposit and sign a contract that protects only them.
Read real reviews about Romanian Pass